Edinburgh, encouragement and a call to arms

This week I have been lucky enough to be invited to speak at the 55th St Andrew's Day Symposium, hosted by the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh. I was given the topic of 'apps and technology' in relation to managing a long-term condition like diabetes, but obviously - not content with that - I managed to sprinkle in a wafer-thin analogy of what living with type 1 is like, along with all sorts of stuff about the #doc and the transformative potential of online peer support communities.

I tried to cover the infuriatingly fickle nature of type 1 diabetes, mentioned a few 'old favourites' like mySugr and the Accu-Chek Expert which have helped me attempt to tame my own 'diabetes monster' and also just a few of the many other things that I know help others in different ways. Gathering data and then learning to be able to apply it to make small improvements. Not forgetting, of course, the support you can get from those facing the same battles every day, whether in terms of just keeping going when it all falls to pieces (again!), or in people sharing experiences and strategies that work for them that you can consider for your own self-management.

It seemed to go relatively well, and people were very encouraging - but the absolute stand-out for me about the whole experience were the conversations I had with some passionate diabetologists after the session had ended. I had deliberately avoided focussing too much attention on the more obvious technological advances like pumps and CGM, as I had wanted the talk to have as wide a reach as possible, and also perhaps fire the imaginations of clinicians working in other disciplines as to how they might make use of similar apps/peer support resources in their own specialism.

Speaking to those diabetes specialists afterwards was something of a call to arms. Much money is being spent on healthcare in the UK which does *not* have the ongoing quality of life benefit for individuals that sensor augmented pump therapy offers - let alone the extension of life for pump users as shown in recent research. The case was made to me that it is time the diabetes online community stopped being so darned understanding about the lack of funding for sensor-augmented pump therapy. The time for accepting defeat has passed, and as more and more data are made available from increasingly positive trials, we need to start banging the table if we are ever to move pump/CGM into the mainstream in the UK.

I got the distinct feeling that there are many clinicians who feel strongly that this is the way forward for type 1 care, but that patient voices as part of that change are crucial. Certainly the impact of patient support in Scotland's wider adoption of pump therapy in recent years sets an encouraging precedent.

Yes I *know* we go on about it all the time among ourselves (often with a resigned sigh and bit of self-funding) - but perhaps the moment has come to really start ramping up the pressure.

Disclaimer. My travel, and accommodation was paid for, but I was not paid to prepare or deliver my talk. I was also invited to attend a swanky dinner at the end of the Symposium which was lovely.

Unusual suspects : age at diagnosis

A short while ago I was musing about one of the questions which form part of the scope of my little side project. It got me thinking, and in order to have a slim chance of having something to say when the subject eventually comes up for discussion I began to wonder just how old people generally are when they are diagnosed with various types of diabetes.

In the old days, of course, things were much more straightforward - even the conditions themselves were referred in terms of 'juvenile' and 'maturity' onset. But I'm forever coming across folks in forums who were diagnosed with 'type 1' (which is typically thought of as a condition that develops in childhood) well into their autumn years.

There was an obvious answer to satisfy my curiosity - just ask you lot. So I decided to conduct a quick straw poll and asked around the good people of the DOC for their age at diagnosis. Now of course this was not carried out with much, if any scientific rigour - but I find the results fascinating nonetheless.

First off I was absolutely humbled and amazed as ever by people's generosity of spirit in the DOC. Within hours of tweeting, "I'm just curious..." I'd been inundated by responses from people who had never heard of me before and my little tweet was bouncing all over the twitosphere with RT after RT. Facebookers and forum peeps waded in and before you could say, "well I wasn't expecting that" I had over 220 responses. Two hundred. And twenty. Many of the 'proper' research projects I see and read have sample populations in the 10s. People even continued to respond for a short while after I'd gathered the results in from the various places.

While I recognise that I was asking a particularly skewed demographic, I found it interesting that after logging 70 or 80 anonymised responses into a spreadsheet the proportions of people in the different age groups remained almost entirely unchanged right up until that 221st person chipped in. So while I completely accept the limitations of the survey I do wonder whether it isn't that far off the real picture.

So what did I discover?
The first and perhaps most surprising thing I discovered was that members of the DOC are much more likely to be type 1. I'm not absolutely sure why this is - perhaps because the management of type 2 is often downplayed by healthcare professionals and people are (mistakenly) led to believe that type 2 is somehow 'less serious'. People with type 1 it seems are more likely to feel like they are struggling and to seek help and support online. So while in the UK population type 1's make up only 10% of diabetics, in my survey they represent 72% of responses!

Oldest and youngest
Of the type 1's the age at diagnosis ranged from just a few months old right up to 66. Type 2's were similarly stereotype-defying ranging from 17 up to 66 again. The average age for diagnosis with type 1 was 18, while the average age for type 2 diagnosis was 45. I didn't specifically ask the question, but at least a dozen people volunteered the information that they had first been diagnosed as type 2 and later reclassified as type 1 or LADA. The average age for the first diagnosis in this group was 35. It would seem that if you are diagnosed with diabetes in your 30s then you stand the highest chance of your Dr putting a tick in the wrong box, and if the treatment you are receiving isn't working despite your best efforts it might be worth asking for some more tests!

Just the facts ma'am
For those who fancy poring over the numbers/proportions for themselves here are the basic analysis tables that Excel squirted out:

	Type 1	Type 2	Total
Number	158	63	221
Average Dx Age	18	45
Dx uncertainty/change	12
Avg Age at initial Dx if changed	35
By age group	Type 1	Type 2	T1 %	T2 %
<= 17	90	0	57%	0%
18-34	47	7	30%	15%
35-44	14	24	9%	38%
45-64	5	29	3%	38%
65+	2	3	1%	5%

So while, as you might expect, over 50% of T1s are diagnosed by the age of 18, almost half of them aren't. Coupled with which the number of people diagnosed with type 2 in their 20s - early 30s is a pretty meagre 15%, with the several of those being later reclassified). One T1 respondent mentioned that at 18 they were told they were 'too old' to be type 1. For another this happened in their mid-20s.

It would seem that getting diagnosed at an unusual age is, well... er... not that unusual.